Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 9,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2008, 3:45 pm
Dayton filed this action against the Commission in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio under 42 U.S.C. 1983, seeking a permanent injunction against the state proceedings on the ground that any investigation of Dayton's hiring process or any imposition of sanctions for Dayton's nonrenewal or termination decisions would violate [477 U.S. 619, 625] the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
– Judicial Fairness Initiative (E.D. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:56 am
In disagreeing with the trial court, the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District held that SB 610 does not mandate that a WSA cover all existing users or a specific methodology for determining sufficiency. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
” Both the district court and the 9th Circuit concluded that the deputies could be held liable under the provocation doctrine. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
In fact, the State admitted as much at oral argument before the district court (see here at App. 1-147–48). [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:34 pm
El Dorado Irrigation District (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 239 (discussed on the blog here: https://www.ceqadevelopments.com/2022/03/01/third-district-rejects-ceqa-challenges-to-el-dorado-irrigation-district-ditch-piping-project-holds-eirs-project-description-and-analysis-of-potential-hydrology-biological-resources-and-wil/), and Newtown Preservation Society v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:43 am
Sept. 12, 2018), the federal appellate court affirmed the district court’s determination that the charging documents adequately listed the elements of a violation under 18 US Code § 1035, affirming the indictment and ultimate conviction. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
First, Paradis does not note the massive changes to the convening authority’s posttrial review power now encoded in Article 60a of the UCMJ. [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:31 pm
The First District Illinois Appellate Court acknowledged that a Rule 304(a) finding does not have to exactly mirror the rule, but the circumstances do have to reflect the desirability of an interlocutory appeal. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
With regard to the first Graham factor, the scope and content of the prior art, the district court correctly found no genuine issue of material fact. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:01 pm
"But judicial tools for deterrence can only go so far (as the courts often remind us). [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm
But they couldn't.Third, standing Supreme Court precedent holds that use of acquitted conduct is proper, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
District Court for the District of Colorado. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 am
Relation to State laws 817. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:40 am
Western Heritage Insurance Company, Case No. 12-20123-COOKE/TORRES, United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
Allegations that contempt proceedings were improper in the first instance do not state a defense to contempt. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:11 pm
This is the first judicial ruling directly addressing the issue of whether it is legal to use the emergency declaration for that purpose. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
Accordingly, the Court will apply federal law principals to both the state and federal law claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am
" This position is based on a rather egregious mis-reading of the leading Supreme Court case on the matter, Richardson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Nor is it clear whether the Biden administration and federal courts are able and willing to do anything to prevent this from happening unless Congress acts first. [read post]
