Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 7261 - 7280 of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by Elizabeth Murrill
” And, according to Morton v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 9:17 pm
What is overlooked in all of these efforts is one simple fact--under Cohen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda)   Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch)   France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dickerson’s opinion also drew support from a 2004 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Court in Anastos v Sable in which that court upheld application of a minority discount to the valuation of the partnership interest of a partner who wrongfully dissolved the partnership under that state’s statute equivalent to New York Partnership Law § 69. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:27 am by Thomas Margoni
This decision, although being ‘just’ a preliminary injunction, set the stage for the term ‘active hosting’ as used by the district court of Milan in its decision RTI v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm by Darren O'Donovan
This case would represent a chance for the Irish judiciary to look at again at the Crotty v An Taoiseach, a case recalled with admiration by the barrister Vincent Martin in today’s Irish Times. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
Because each year of service contributes to the overall value of the pension, the marital portion of the pension increases in value the longer the pension holder works. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]