Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 7261 - 7280 of 8,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2010, 5:43 am by Erin Miller
Castaneda (08-1529; 08-1547) – petitioner’s reply brief United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm by justinsilverman
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:31 am by Ben Sheffner
That statute unquestionably states that, in order for an ISP to benefit from the Section 512(a) safe harbor for "Transitory Digital Network Communications," it must "adopt[] and reasonably implement[], and inform[] subscribers and account holders ... of, a policy that provides for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscribers and account holders of the service provider’s system or network who are repeat infringers. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:25 am by Erin Miller
  One hopes that, 55 years after Brown v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am by Ashby Jones
By now, it seems that everyone with a laptop has decided to weigh in on the Potus v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
The OPR began an investigation in November of 2003 after the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Michigan referred allegations of prosecutorial misconduct against Assistant United States Attorney Richard Convertino -- former lead trial counsel in the case of United States v. [read post]