Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 8,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
However, in an opinion piece at the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
The U.S. government then initiated removal proceedings against him. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:07 am
His family is in Texas. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
"We do not usually think of a 10-day sentence for the unauthorized possession of a trivial amount of a prescription drug as an 'aggravated felony'," he wrote.Because of its strict wording, the 1996 law had required deportation even for legal residents who have lived in the United States for decades and served in the U.S. military. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:18 am
The Holland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am
The U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am
Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504, 507 (1951); see also O’Keefe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
LEXIS 56618, (ED TX, June 9, 2010), a Texas federal district court adopted the recommendations of a federal magistrate judge (2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:46 pm
The case he discusses is Hamilton v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:03 am
The U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
In MGM v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
Nor is this just in one jurisdiction — I found prosecutions in Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington State. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:20 am
LEXIS 53236 (D AZ, May 6, 2010), an Arizona federal district court concluded that an inmate failed to state a free exercise claim in his complaint that food items were missing from his trays.In Cosco v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:12 am
On Friday, May 14, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit announced that it would grant an ‘en banc’ hearing of the TiVo v. [read post]
