Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 7261 - 7280 of 8,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
United States   Research and Resources Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple’s New App Tracking Policy, Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, Spring 2021, Thomas Hoppner and Philipp Westerhoff, Technical University Wildau and Hausfeld RA LLP. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  Little sentiment was expressed on the bench in favor of allowing foreign investors to come to America to sue for fraud that occurred mainly overseas, even if there were some connection to the United States. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 am by Adam Gillette
 Finally, this post would be insufficiently snarky if it did not point out that the last time Virginia decided to engage in armed revolution against the United State did not achieve the result that Virginia wanted. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  But might So might one describe pre-2022 MLB as a form of “federalism” in which constituent units, each with their own measure of “sovereignty” were entitled to make their own rules, at least up to a point? [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:58 am by jonathanturley
In the United States, it is extremely difficult to maintain a “group libel” case even when there is jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm by Mary
The United States has a long tradition of protection for reader privacy. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court had been asked to consider a challenge to an insider trading conviction. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
United States, are consistently cited in Supreme Court opinions, in constitutional law casebooks, and at confirmation hearings as prime examples of weak constitutional analysis. .... [read post]