Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 7261 - 7280 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Finally, the United States Supreme Court ruling on the Wayfair case opened new pathways for states to legally tax remote sales. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:03 am by Larry
United States, but similar to the last post, I am not going to review that decision in detail. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 (1946) ("[I]f one cannot say, with fair assurance, . . . that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error, it is impossible to conclude that substantial rights were not affected. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:20 pm
”Plaintiff’s evidence evidence mainly consisted of a one-page map of the United States with text stating: “100% Hispanic Coverage more than 50,000 points of sales, 220 Food Service Distributors, 209 Distributors. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Ken White
United States, the leading case here in the Ninth Circuit applying it. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
Statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and the party challenging the statute has a heavy burden to establish that it is unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
For Lee, who had come to the United States nearly 30 years before, this was a penalty worse than prison: He owned two restaurants in the United States and was the sole caregiver for his elderly parents; by contrast, he no longer had any ties to South Korea, where he was born. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
” On the other side of the balance, the judge noted the government’s interest in detaining those who “actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the United States during ongoing international conflict” and ensuring [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by John Hopkins
A recent article in e-discovery Law Review about the case of the United States v. [read post]