Search for: "Williams v. A" Results 7261 - 7280 of 19,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 4:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
District Judge William Orrick said in a tentative ruling in federal court in San Francisco that "while Congress and the president can extend the protection of law to animals as well as humans, there is no indication that they did so in the Copyright Act. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm by CJLF Staff
  Richard Weizel of Reuters reports that last August, in the case of Santiago v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by SHG
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Probably Not As Much As You Think – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Proof of Specific Licenses Required to Rebut Successful First Sale Defense – Seattle intellectual property lawyer Tonya Gisselberg on her blog, Seattle Copyright Watch Drinking Milkshakes v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Grand Canyon Trust Opening Brief Havasupai Opening Brief Federal Answer Brief Energy Fuels Resources Answer Brief [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am by John Rubin
Utley, 956 S.W.2d 489 (Tenn. 1997) (speedy trial right does not attach until arrest or grand jury action) with Williams v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am by John Rubin
Utley, 956 S.W.2d 489 (Tenn. 1997) (speedy trial right does not attach until arrest or grand jury action) with Williams v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The last case in this category I want to look at is the Spycatcher trial (HM Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am by Michael Dorf
Casey, Chief Justice William Rehnquist claimed that the controlling joint opinion of Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter rejected two key features of Roe v. [read post]