Search for: "Block v. State" Results 7281 - 7300 of 9,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm by Richard Hunt
The last gasp was an effort to stop the federal lawsuit because there was a parallel state court action based entirely on state law principles. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Xu was indicted for committing the crime of subverting state power on 5 August 2021. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
 USA Today’s Brad Heath twitted a great quote** from United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm by Amy Howe
In 1970, Stevens was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
Flickr user objects to Independent newspaper’s unauthorised use of his photo (1709 Copyright Blog) (IP Whiteboard) Copyright woes of a game designer: Burrows v Smith (IP Osgoode) Neutralize UK file-sharing legal threats – Join TalkTalk (TorrentFreak) EWHC: No infringement; invalidity for lack of inventive step: Research in Motion Limited v Motorola (EPLAW) (IPKat)   United States US Patents Claiming under the influence (of Bilski) (12:01 Tuesday) USPTO… [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 5:51 am by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
” Possible sanctions include ineligibility for, or revocation of, visas to enter the United States or blocking of property and property interests. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
Development here is understood as a pathway that moves away from the structures, patterns, and sensibilities of oppression in which their national identities were forged, but spiced with the fundamental premise that such a pathway is inevitably blocked by the other two orders, though in very different ways.Pix credit hereFor an instant in time, the Wheel appeared to turn in favor of the post-colonial, post-imperial orders. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am by Richard Hunt
Nov. 8, 2019) a District Judge in California disagrees, finding that blind plaintiffs unhappy with electric scooters stated a plausible claim under Title II of the ADA because “[i]t was predictable, not just foreseeable, that the scooters would sometimes be parked carelessly and block” the path of the disabled. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
In 2006 in Hamden v Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in their plans to hold military commission trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am by Ronald Collins
Hockett, A Storm over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. [read post]