Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 7,403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2020, 7:40 am
This group, however, does not work off of a blank slate. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Under Aleman Gonzalez, a trial judge can no longer tell the U.S. government, “I hereby order you to stop applying Immigration Policy X to group Y. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:44 am
If one settlor spouse wants to revoke the trust, and the other does not, is the other settlor spouse “a person holding an adverse interest”? [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
Pix Credit: U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Further, is there is any inconsistency with respect to the “official” status of an individual in the classified service between the records of the employer and the records of the responsible civil service commission, the records of the commission control[i].It may be helpful to review briefly the State’s personnel system at this point as the lawfulness of the layoff of a particular individual is dependent on “making the correct personnel decision the first time. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have signed this proclamation and caused the Seal of the United States of America to be affixed. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:01 pm
Does the gender of the CEO make any real difference in performance? [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 6:36 am
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
Furthermore, the court suggested that Reznikoff’s evidence might have been sufficient were it not for concession: “I am sorry I can’t give you any statistics, but we don’t have them. [read post]
31 May 2022, 7:06 am
Carjackings Surge in Democrat Run Cities – How Do I Protect Myself? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:31 am
The MOC's announcement does not specify how such prior registrations will be treated. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Argument [I.] [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
The Circuit acknowledged that “[i]n theory, a researcher who searches for statistical significance in multiple attempts raises the probability of discovering it purely by chance, committing Type I error (i.e., finding a false positive). [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 1:59 am
Recall # F-0783-2010;7) I M. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
What I see is a serious lack of scientific evidence for her claims, and a serious misunderstanding of the relevant law. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
I. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
For example, if I owe a debt to person X in Cairo but I am currently in Damascus, I can approach a hawala broker and pay my debt to him. [read post]
