Search for: "Mark"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 151,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2024, 3:41 am
The Board found the registered mark to be weak in view of numerous third-party uses, and the two marks more dissimilar than similar. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:42 am
The Board sustained the Section 2(d) claim, finding the applied-for mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark FOCUS for other computer software programs. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
Anybody who's been in law firm marketing listens when Mark Beese speaks. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:30 am
In choosing a trade mark therefore one has to see whether the mark satisfies the requirement of distinctiveness contained in section 9 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:05 am
Bumb "lacked the requisite bona fide intention to use the MITHRIL mark in commerce when he filed his intent-to-use application to register that mark. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:45 am
Deeming Opposer's mark to be "strong and entitled to a broad scope of protection," the Board sustained this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark SWEDISH LUXURY for, inter alia, mattresses and related retail store services [SWEDISH disclaimed], finding it confusingly similar to the registered mark SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM for "mattresses, cushions and pillows made of elastic viscous foam" [SLEEP SYSTEM disclaimed]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:20 am
In any event, the Board found the differences in the marks to be dispositive. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:04 am
Greenbaum cut her teeth on the PHILADELPHIA'S CHEESESTEAK appeal, penning the Board's opinion affirming the PTO's refusals to register that mark for "sandwiches; sandwiches, namely, cheesesteaks" [CHEESESTEAK disclaimed] on the grounds that (1) the mark is confusingly similar to the registered marks PHILADELPHIA CHEESESTEAK CO. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:29 am
It says that consumers will perceive BLUECAR as "an arbitrary mark, or perhaps as a mark suggesting a clean, blue sky, that is, that the electric-powered vehicles are environmentally friendly. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
Applicant conceded that CALIFORNIA is a geographical term and that Applicant is located in California, but it contended that the mark is a unitary term composed of the distinctive word "California" and the suggestive term "Green Clean," and, therefore, that the mark in its entirety is suggestive. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:53 am
The situation is stronger in respect of the opponents' [logo mark] in that the goods are identical and the marks have a degree of similarity such that the average consumer would be directly confused. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:53 am
The mark under challenge is a composite mark with a black-and-white cross and the words 'SWISS MILITARY'. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:21 am
The Court concluded that the mark as a whole evoked “the technique of science for the skin treatment”. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 8:36 am
The Court also held that goods may be so dissimilar that the later mark is unlikely to bring the earlier mark to mind. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:28 am
Looking next at the parties' respective marks, it was plain that they were not identical; nor did Walsh's mark deceive the public. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:53 am
”Similarity of the Marks: Applicant’s mark incorporates Texas A&M's mark in its entirety. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:40 pm
You can find more information on these websites:http://www.ferruzzo.com/staff/mziebold.asphttp://www.linkedin.com/in/markzieboldhttp://www.avvo.com/attorneys/92660-ca-mark-ziebold-119392.htmlhttp://twitter.com/markzieboldhttp://www.naymz.com/search/mark/ziebold/1800194http://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer/mark-allen-ziebold-79731/That should get you started if you are wondering if I would be a good fit to work with on your tax or estate planning matter. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:11 pm
While Marks & Spencer and Interflora argued a ruling by the EU Court of Justice is in their favor, a U.K. national court will have to make the final decision on whether Marks & Spencer’s use of the Interflora trademarks “jeopardizes” the reputation of Interflora’s intellectual property. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:53 pm
Welcome to SmartTalk , episode 15, in which Victor and Mark discuss how Video Killed The Radio Star; bulls eyes vs. quadrants; how Mark hired his first assistant; why Victor can make better copies than his assistant; whether employees are a profit center or an expense; Mark’s three rules for having great employees; how you can break even but still come out ahead; autonomy vs. pay as an employee motivator; drilling holes above the waterline; how to differentiate your… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:48 am
Is it a strong, distinctive mark that will pass muster with trademark law, or is it a weak, non-distinctive mark that will inevitably be rejected by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)? [read post]
