Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 7281 - 7300 of 19,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2025, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
This case and others related to juvenile justice are included in the Juvenile Justice Case Compendium.] [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 9:14 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin revoked his citizenship in May 2005. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:02 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1980, the Supreme Court decided the case of Hicks v. [read post]
Not only does this strategy undermine our commitment to a right of access to the courts, and ignore the Supreme Court of Canada’s clear statement in Pintea v John that SRLs cannot and should not be treated the same way as expert counsel, but by punishing SRLs for their unintended mistakes with vexatious litigant and court restriction orders, this strategy is also making the public angrier and even more indignant at their treatment in Canada’s Access to… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Lee v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:38 pm
 However, even if a contractor fails to comply with the law, there is still a possibility that he could receive justice if his intentions and actions are honest. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
This obviously unconstitutional law under still binding Supreme Court precedent was the brainchild of a former Justice Scalia clerk (of course) and its intent was to 1) stop most abortions in Texas, and 2) preclude any meaningful pre-enforcement review of the law. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:45 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today (transcript here) in Thompson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:53 pm by david
He filed an opinion dissenting from the court’s other decision that day, Miller v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:05 pm
James Taranto questions the effect of the disparate impact test established by the Supreme Court in Griggs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth cautions that, when the court decides Jam v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Shannon Rohn discusses the court’s recent decision in in Endrew F. v. [read post]