Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 10,161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
Google and Apple should pay heed (IAM) Australia Apple and Samsung talk possible ‘deal’ as hearing again adjourned (Patentology) (Patentology) (Patentology) (IP Whiteboard) Canada Radio-streaming app developer threatened with a take-down notice by CBC (ipblog.ca) Behind the Scenes of Bill C-32: Govt’s clause-by-clause analysis raises constitutional questions (Michael Geist) Copyright is back: Why Canada is keeping the flawed digital lock rules (Michael Geist)… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:36 pm
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
The other appeal, Holder v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Kona Blue Water Farms, LLC, 2010 WL 3566731, the United States District Court in Hawaii ruled that punitive damages are available under the general maritime law claims of unseaworthiness, citing the Ninth Court of Appeals’ decision in Evich v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Moreover, it cites cases as far back as the 1800s, including Merrill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
Russell KNAGGS and Ramzy KHACHIK v the United Kingdom – 46559/06 [2011] ECHR 1328 (30 August 2011) European Court of Human Rights: refusal to admit intercept evidence in court proceedings not breach of human rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:44 pm
This has been on my to-do list for a long time, so I finally did it, and you can see the result, Draft bill proposing amendment to Texas Constitution for establishment of a state grand jury for the review of the constitutionality of the actions of United States government officials and agents, and to authorize state grand juries to investigate public administration.It is posted on the Tenth Amendment Center site at… [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US Patents A trio of post-Bilski cases fail to clearly define the meaning of ‘abstract’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Google calls on Big Blue again; SEC filing reveals speed of Motorola patent due diligence (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Computer programs and patentable subject matter: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:35 pm
United States (jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims)Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
This represents a significant departure from the longstanding United States patent law giving the first person to invent a device priority over all others. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:12 am
., v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
Stat. 764h(a), requires health insurers to cover the behavioral analysis services provided by private schools to children with autism spectrum disorders.Billing Fraud: DOCTORS, PHARMACISTS AMONG 26 CHARGED IN $37 MILLION BILLING FRAUD SCHEME, United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
This past year the United States Supreme Court dealt one of the most devastating blows to consumers yet, allowing big corporations to cheat Americans out of millions of dollars. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm
Current copyright law precludes copyright protection for any work “prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties”. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
The recent Supreme Court term resulted in a number of very important decisions that will impact companies engaging in advertising and marketing in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
Its earlier quotation from Buckley v UK would seem to intimate so. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
” And then there was the Bill of Rights, shipped off to the states for ratification shortly after the original document itself. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
In the courts: BN, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2367 (Admin) (16 September 2011): Sec of State irrational in ignoring fresh evidence in Malawi asylum claim. [read post]
