Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 7301 - 7320 of 12,452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 11:41 am by Stephen Bilkis
The need for on-the-spot decisions by law enforcement officials does not afford them the luxury of a contemporaneous in-depth analysis or consultation with counsel. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:33 pm by Kevin
According to police the entire incident started at 1:27 a.m. and ended when Sash was tased at 1:56, but he spent an unknown amount of time first hiding behind a tree and then refusing to comply with instructions (hence the tasing). [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 25 Greenwoods Motion for Summary J + Tribal Appellate Court Decision 27 State Farm Motion for Summary J 27-1 Tribal Court Complaint 27-3 State Farm Tribal Court Motion to Dismiss 37 Greenwood Response 38 State Farm Response 39 State Farm Reply 42 MJ Order An excerpt: In summary, the court concludes that the tribal court does have jurisdiction over the Greenwoods’ claims against State Farm. [read post]
14 May 2014, 1:19 pm
Several years into their marriage, a Muslim couple entered into a contract that provided, in part: 1. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:43 am by Ron Coleman
Unfortunately, says Eric, that analysis took place on page 26 of 27. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:47 am
”  Further subsections (6E) to (6G) provide definitions to interpret the scope of this exclusion.In leaving subsection 60(5) of the Act unchanged, the UK Act contains equivalent wording to Article 27 UPC. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
DeJohn, supra.The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the arguments by noting that under Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 26(B)(1), the scope of discovery in a civil suit encompasses “`any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party’”. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:14 pm
However, the South African case does not involve a denial of the opportunity to practice law (Chang himself was admitted to the New York State bar before being denied the right to gain a license to practice after moving to California), but rather a scenario in which activist lawyers (often communists) disbarred or struck from the roll of attorneys and advocates while fighting apartheid, were later (in the post-apartheid era) reinstated to the bar. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:51 pm by emagraken
 In reaching this conclusion the Court provided the following reasons:  [1]             On January 27, 2010, following a two-day trial, the action of the plaintiff, Laurie-Ann Bay, against the defendant, Todd Pasieka, was dismissed. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:37 pm by Cicely Wilson
Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.Read More: Appeals court says 27-year-old could not run for president on CA ballot Santer v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:59 am by Kevin
(emphasis added)What Does the Report Mean For the Geospatial Community? [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:00 am
  Claims 28 through 37 were on appeal—claims 1 through 27 were cancelled during prosecution. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:00 am
  See Seavey, 2012 WL 253116, at *1 (employing the unusual term “off brand”). [read post]