Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 7301 - 7320
of 42,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 8:48 am
[C.] [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:14 am
He married June Flewett (the inspiration for Lucy Pevensie in C. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:47 am
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
The senior Donald Trump is a more interesting case. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
Taylor No. 104402558 Grant Dickinson, Attorney for Appellant Anthony C. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:54 am
While SB 1792 does not apply to state or national banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, or insurance companies, anti-evasion provisions of the Act provide that a purported agent or service provider is a lender if: (a) it holds, acquires, or maintains, directly or indirectly, the predominant economic interest in the loan; (b) it markets, brokers, arranges, or facilitates the loan and holds the right, requirement, or first right of refusal to purchase loans, receivables, or… [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:33 am
By Jason Dubner For nearly 75 years, the McCarran-Ferguson Act established a broad – although not unlimited – exemption from the application of federal law to “the business of insurance,” finding “the continued regulation and taxation by the several states [of that business] in the public interest. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:33 am
By Jason Dubner For nearly 75 years, the McCarran-Ferguson Act established a broad – although not unlimited – exemption from the application of federal law to “the business of insurance,” finding “the continued regulation and taxation by the several states [of that business] in the public interest. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
His lucid, learned and comprehensive book is now an indispensable guide to this burgeoning field.' David Armitage, Lloyd C. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:14 pm
“Rule Number Uno”: you will do prevention The first ground of nullity raised by the defendants appears as interesting as it is rarely raised. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:58 am
To this end, David examined the CJEU’s ruling in C-367/15 OTK, which found that a lump sum could be requested of the person who infringed the right without them having to prove the actual loss). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
… Le Blogue du CRLSélection SOQUIJ – Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania c. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 2:11 am
Farro appealed from the lower court’s denial of his preliminary injunction motion, the dismissal of his claim to invalidate the merger based on non-compliance with LLC Law § 1002 (c)’s meeting requirement, and the dismissal of his claim to rescind the 2011 agreement giving Schochet a one-third interest in LMEG. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 7:01 am
Article 58(c) of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s interim Transitional Administrative Law for Iraq of 2004 and its subsequent incorporation into Article 140 of the permanent Iraqi Constitution of 2005 attempted to address the status of the disputed territories with a census, but it has yet to be conducted. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania c. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm
This Round up was complied by Suneet Sharma a junior legal professional with a particular interest and experience in media, information and privacy law. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:32 am
An Illinois divorce court has the option of bypassing the formula and awarding child support based on “the best interests of the child and evidence which shows relevant factors including…the standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage or civil union not been dissolved” 750 ILCS 505(a)(2)(C) One can imagine a very wealthy parent having to provide additional non-guidelines child support to a much less wealthy parent so that the children can… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 6:36 am
C. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:56 am
Accordingly, a low degree of similarity between those goods or services may be offset by a high degree of similarity between the marks, and vice versa (C‑39/97, Canon).The General Court concluded that, having regard to all the above considerations and given the inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark, the Board had been correct to find that there was a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
The only thing an Illinois divorce litigant needs to allege is that “[i]rreconcilable differences have caused the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and the court determines that efforts at reconciliation have failed or that future attempts at reconciliation would be impracticable and not in the best interests of the family. [read post]
