Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 7301 - 7320 of 10,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Flynn, and Chuck Callan, Broadridge, on Thursday, February 9, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Corporate governance, ESG, Proxy voting, Say on pay, SEC Outlook for Activism in 2023 Posted by James E. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Kiran Bhat
As Conor noted yesterday, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:20 am by Joshua Auriemma
The most recent comScore Smartphone Market Share Report reveals that Android is now the most widely-used mobile OS in the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Summerfield Browne Limited v Phillip James Waymouth [2021] EWHC 85 (QB) This case, which can be read in full here, was the first case in which an order under section 13 was made. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Flynn, and Chuck Callan, Broadridge, on Thursday, February 9, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Corporate governance, ESG, Proxy voting, Say on pay, SEC Outlook for Activism in 2023 Posted by James E. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
§ 203(c)(1) states: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”In, Dimeo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am by Lawfare Staff
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper predicted that China will continue its land reclamation campaign this year in order to bolster its “exorbitant” claims in the South China Sea. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am by Elina Saxena
” According to State Department sources, the number of militants fighting for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is at its lowest in two years. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]