Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 7301 - 7320 of 15,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Employment suspension — Arbitrary and capricious Ying-Jun Chen worked for the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (the “Department”) until late fall of 2011, when he was suspended for ten days based on his low productivity and other problems, then suspended for an additional fifteen days after he responded inappropriately to the ... [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 12:06 pm by Nassiri Law
California joins minimum wage battle with new bill, June 4, 2015, OC Register More Blog Entries: Walz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:23 am by Simon Fodden
We meet her in Chapter V, The Wine Shop, where she sits, knits, and “sees nothing. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 12:41 pm
  The dissent thinks not.Personally, I think that the evidence of prejudice is fairly low. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm by Giles Peaker
This is not a usual blog post. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:17 am
The district court explained that "[s]ignificant to the analysis here, '[a]ctions that aid and abet in violating the injunction must occur after the injunction is imposed for the purposes of Rule 65(d)(2)(C).' Blockowicz v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
             The shell under which the bean appears to be hidden is, of course, Medtronic v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:58 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources:Mishap leaves home-care workers waiting weeks for paychecks, June 2, 2015, LA Times More Blog Entries: Adams v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:46 am by Jim Walker
This is a cruise line that fired 150 Indian waiters who protested low wages and found themselves black-balled from the cruise industry. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:15 am by Afro Leo
#Sandtondiscussion— goldenrail (@Ivoryblossum) June 1, 2015Check out this very informative summary of the case Starbucks v British Sky Broadcasting which #sandtondiscussion https://t.co/uR2F8FNGBd— Yongz (@EricMashida) June 1, 2015 [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:49 am by NBlack
If New York lawyers are prevented by the operation of an antiquated statute from providing low-cost transactional legal services to a population in need of them then many of these potential clients will turn to websites that provide low cost wills and forms directly to the consumer. [read post]