Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 7301 - 7320 of 16,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am by Giles Peaker
” The Court reminded itself of the high threshold for a mandatory, rather than prohibitory injunction, of a ‘strong prima facie case’, via Francis V Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2003] 1 WLR 2248, then went on to the criteria for the exercise of the discretion to accommodate pending appeal in R v Camden London Borough Council ex parte Mohammed [1997] 30 HLR 315. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:56 am by SHG
In a ghoulish and deeply disturbing decision, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Albrecht v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:04 am by Rosalind English
Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 – read judgment  It was coincidental that this cricket libel case and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported in Hunton & Williams' Employment & Labor Perspectives blog: A recent New York state trial court decision, Romano v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:55 am by James Bickford
In Forbes, Karlyn Bowman put together the recent poll on public approval of the Supreme Court and the discussion of Citizens United and the State of the Union address to argue that American support for the Court is both strong and unlikely to erode. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
  Otherwise, we excuse conduct, like the conduct at issue here, which invites strategic duplicity into the warrant process.[13] Strong words indeed. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Indeed, it is a bit difficult to explain why, exactly, password guessing leads to unauthorized access — the Fifth Circuit was forced to explain that seemingly obvious conclusion in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by David Markus
Judge Wilson, joined by a visiting judge, issued this opinion in United States v. [read post]