Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 11,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 1:38 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:30 pm
ImageCube, represented by Niro, Haller, & Niro, lost at the CAFC:ImageCube LLC (“ImageCube”) appeals a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granting judgment of noninfringement with respect to claims 1, 25, 32, and 34, and the claims de- pendent therefrom, of United States Reissue Patent 37,875 (“’875 patent”) as to defendant The Boeing Com- pany (“Boeing”). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
UPDATE: You may have heard the cheers emanating from Bentonville, Arkansas (the location of Wal-Mart's corporate headquarters), and the corporate headquarters of other large employers following the United States Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm
They brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its widely-anticipated decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
Disney Enterprises Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:42 pm
AT&T Internet Servs, Inc., No. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
United States, 434 F.3d 1359, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
As background for their decision, the court cited the long history of recusal in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm
”[8] Copyright infringement did not reach the mainstream level of Sony until A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
” Toll Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
The Michigan Supreme Court considered the application for leave to appeal in Cedroni Associates, Inc v Tomblinson, Harburn Associates Architects & Planners, Inc, No. 142339, and directed the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
This article was sponsored by the United States Air Force, a Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award, and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
Crowdsourcing commercialised (IPKat) P2P (seminar): the aftermath (IPKat) Hargreaves Review (Kluwer Patent Blog) United States US Patents Microsoft joins Article One’s new preemptive troll-fighting service (The Prior Art) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court affirms high standard of proving patents invalid – Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (Patently-O) (IPBiz) (IAM) (IPBiz)… [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:26 pm
On June 13, 2011, the Supreme Court for the State of New York, Appellate Division, issued an opinion in the case of Bank of New York v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
See United States v. [read post]
