Search for: "Line v. People" Results 7321 - 7340 of 13,532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:33 am by Joy Waltemath
It scoffed at the notion that devoting five to seven employees on the task for a two-month period (the employer’s estimate of what compliance with the subpoena would require) would disrupt its normal business operations when the multi-million dollar company employed over 50,000 people. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am by Jim Walker
Carnival (cruise lines have duty to warn of crimes in ports of call), Johnson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:05 am by Dean Freeman
Rather than pay for more workers, the company skimps in order to line their own pockets. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
The Forum Secretariat has sought to accommodate as many requests for externally- organized parallel events as possible in line with the inclusive nature of the Forum. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Petty Justice uses an unusually well-documented example of the colonial sessions system in Loyalist New Brunswick to examine the role of justices of the peace and other front-line low law officials like customs officers and deputy land surveyors in colonial local government – U of T Press Ruin and Redemption: The Struggle for Canadian Bankruptcy Law, 1867-1919 by Thomas Telfer University of Toronto Press In 1880 the federal Parliament of Canada repealed the Insolvent Act of 1875,… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am by Andy Wang
” The principle provides an example: As part of a project to identify and prosecute computer criminals, a law enforcement agency considers a proposal to operate a World Wide Web site with information about and computer programs for hacking, links to other hacker sites, and a facility to allow people who access the site to discuss hacking techniques. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
 In years since, many courts have ruled in line with Simpson. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:37 pm
Perhaps Sutton ignored the issue because he believes that the entire question of heightened scrutiny was foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s one line opinion in Baker v. [read post]