Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 178,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 7:05 am
The plaintiff alleges that the defendant’s product CAMCEVI® infringes the plaintiff’s patent, which also covers the plaintiff’s Eligard® product. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:31 pm
Attending Home Care Services, the appellate court reversed a lower court’s decision denying Attending Home Care Services’ (“Attending”) motion to compel arbitration of the plaintiff’s putative class action complaint, and sent the plaintiff’s claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, New York Wage Parity and New York Labor Law to arbitration on an individual basis. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Unsuccessful application by two Insureds for summary judgment, partial summary judgment or an order limiting the Plaintiff's damages to losses not covered by a builder's all-risk policy that had been issued to the Plaintiff. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:01 am
After arriving at the plaintiff’s home, the defendant kicked down the plaintiff’s door and physically attacked him using a stun gun, which resulted in multiple injuries to the plaintiff. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
The court granted defendant's motion in limine to exclude plaintiff's damages expert's "alternative analysis" theory in his supplemental report where he found the parties would agree on a $70 million lump sum royalty. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:43 am
The court granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's supplemental interrogatory response and precluded plaintiff from asserting a conception date at trial earlier than the date disclosed in its preliminary infringement contentions. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:50 pm
On appeal, the Second Department dismissed plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) claim, finding that plaintiff’s injury was related to the weight of the beam being carried as opposed to an elevation-related risk. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:15 am
§ 285 after granting summary judgment that defendants did not infringe plaintiff's patents due to statements made by plaintiff during its appeal of inter partes review proceedings. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:13 am
Also cutting against [plaintiff's] causal nexus arguments is the sizable price difference of the [accused] and [plaintiff's] systems [$2.8 million and $4.4 million.]. . . [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:41 am
The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined (1) that the plaintiff’s property was used for purposes other than residential or professional offices, (2) that such use permanently terminated the plaintiff’s easement over the driveway, (3) that the plaintiff’s breach of a right-of-way agreement was material, and (4) that termination of the easement is not barred by the doctrine of disproportionate… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:50 pm
On appeal, the Second Department dismissed plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) claim, finding that plaintiff’s injury was related to the weight of the beam being carried as opposed to an elevation-related risk. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:36 am
The court granted in part defendants' motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff's claims for one of its boot design patents was barred by equitable estoppel because defendants suffered economic prejudice from plaintiff's misleading conduct. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Technically, the company had issued a recall by the time of the accident, but the couple wasn’t aware of it, plaintiffs say. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:02 pm
The magistrate judge denied plaintiff’s motion to quash upon finding the SCA was inapplicable. [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:00 am
Plaintiff’s chief complaint is that Defendant failed to obtain his full case file from Plaintiff’s former attorney. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Through the plaintiff's deposition, the defendants learned that the plaintiff kept a private journal. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:29 am
"The school regarded these derelictions as misconduct, justifying plaintiff's termination. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:37 pm
Patent No. 5,718,737 (“the ‘737 Patent”) and willful infringement of certain claims of the ‘737 patent and after considering the entire record in the case, the substantial evidence in the record, the parties’ post-trial submissions, and the applicable law, decided to deny Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and all other motions besides Plaintiffs’ motion for prejudgment interest. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:58 am
Plaintiff’s Firm paid HealthPort’s invoice and filed the class action on Plaintiff’s behalf soon thereafter. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 7:25 am
A recent case in front of a California appellate court illustrates one plaintiff’s battle to classify his injury case as one of ordinary negligence. [read post]
