Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 9,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:31 am
The recent New Mexico Supreme Court case of Delfino v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Eschewing judicial triumphalism, the court accepted its “limited” role of applying existing state law:[O]ur role in the exercise of our diversity jurisdiction is limited. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:09 am
The court finds that neither approach states a claim under the Wiretap Act. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
PartsRiver, Kelora (WHDA) District Court N D California: Attorney negligence, revival, and inequitable conduct: Aristocrat Technologies, et. al. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:18 am
First the good: State v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:26 am
See State v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:07 am
Supreme Court in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:00 am
The judge cited Liteky v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 pm
R (Baron, Peat & Othrs) v Hyndburn District Council, Administrative Court, Manchester District Registry, 14 April 2011 (Not on BAILII as yet)J has previously alluded to this case involving an application for permission for Judicial Review of a local authority decision to make a selective licensing designation. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
The district court didn't let him, holding that the United States and California were already defendants and had more than adequate incentives to defend the relevant tax statutes. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:40 pm
Michelson v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:47 am
The environmental plaintiffs rely on United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
* Concluding that the First Amendment claimed by Doninger was not clearly established, the Second Circuit affirmed Federal District court's decision that administrators were entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:43 am
Judicial Bias: The Federal Circuit did address Odom's argument regarding judicial bias by the Oregon court. [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:09 pm
When the Supreme Court decided, in the 2008 case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
(3) Whether “cause” exists for failing to present an ineffective assistance claim in state court, where such a claim may first be raised in postconviction proceedings, and state-appointed postconviction counsel failed to raise a claim implicating actual innocence? [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am
See, e.g., Pollack v. [read post]
