Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Associated Press – AP files seven DMCA takedowns against Drudge Retort blog over users linking to its stories: (The Trademark Blog), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (IPKat), (The Trademark Blog), ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK)… [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
It was reported that in 1998, the Swedish Supreme Court rejected to recognize the Bavarian state as a copyright holder of Mein Kampf. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
It was reported that in 1998, the Swedish Supreme Court rejected to recognize the Bavarian state as a copyright holder of Mein Kampf. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:39 pm
Of course, some of these disclosure suits might be filed in other states. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
Spy/Cat v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
SEC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:06 pm
At issue now, as it was when the Supreme Court decided the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
If so, what must the copyright holder show? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
Is the answer to Question 1 affected by the fact that the Member State has not implemented the Data Storage Directive despite the fact that the period prescribed for implementation has expired? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
With respect to the arbitrary and unrealistic time deadlines, the authors look for support in DeLaune v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
For example, in Dana v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
For instance, Article 7 instructively highlights that states must “consult and take into account the self-expressed needs, knowledge, expertise and perspectives of rights holders,” and “guarantee effective and institutionalized public participation and deliberation mechanisms which are accessible to everyone, in order to meet its human rights obligation of respecting and ensuring meaningful and effective participation. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:24 pm
Supreme Court in 2017 in Carpenter v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Holder decision and allow the federal government intervene when states pass voter suppression laws. [read post]
