Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 7341 - 7360 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by Josh Wright
  If I may borrow from Thom’s description of the case: Brantley, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm by WIMS
 Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 The doctrine can be traced to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in South v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:17 am by Richard Alderman
The court stated: "In 1993, the MERS system was created by several large participants in the real estate mortgage industry to track  ownership interests in residential mortgages" (Matter of MERSCORP, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:07 am by Ray Dowd
Souter (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States sat by designation.Decision below.TMTV Corp v Mass Productions (1st Cir. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 147 F.3d 1374, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:38 am by Richard Montes
In a case having potentially enormous implications on foreclosure actions in New York State and throughout the country, the Second Department in Bank of New York v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am by kylew
  Intel Corp., Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer Inc. were among the companies that supported Roche. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 4:13 am by Gregory Dell
Disability Blog & Cases: Nevada disability lawyer and COX Enterprises Inc's customer service rep sue AETNA Life Insurance Company for denial of disability benefits A former Customer Service Representative (CSR) for COX Enterprises Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
It was reported in the decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in G & G v Wikipedia [2009]. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
Chemque, Inc., 303 F. 3d 1294, 1301 (CA Fed. 2002); Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:02 am by Scott A. McKeown
They claim that the heightened standard of proof is an essential component of the patent “bargain,” see Bonito Boats, Inc. v. [read post]