Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 8,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm
In a radio interview, Evangelical Michael Huckabee argued that the Kentucky civil clerk who refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple was as justified in defying an unjust court decision as people are justified in disregarding Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
The election of 2020 could bring about a new progressive regime without have much of any impact on the present state of polarization. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am
The plaintiff is the wife-executrix of one of the doctors, whose death in 2004 triggered the LLC’s obligation to purchase the deceased member’s interest for a “Stated Value” in accordance with the operating agreement which also required that the Stated Value be updated annually. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 7:50 am
Votes: Both to vacate as moot Grants Pass v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:22 pm
In today’s case (Zhang v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
” Networked surveillance cameras can harm communities by allowing police, or quasi-governmental entities like business improvement districts, by recording how people live their lives, who they communicate with, what protests they attend, and what doctors or lawyers they visit. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
” Networked surveillance cameras can harm communities by allowing police, or quasi-governmental entities like business improvement districts, by recording how people live their lives, who they communicate with, what protests they attend, and what doctors or lawyers they visit. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm
In 2020, Idaho passed a law to prohibit most abortions in the state in the event the Supreme Court ever overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:36 am
Although 48 states and the District of Columbia already provide such protection in state courts, Congress has never passed a federal shield law. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
United States, available here. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:57 am
In overturning Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 4:21 am
In Neiman-Marcus v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:56 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
(Justice Breyer’s colloquy with Paul Clement, counsel for the state plaintiffs, invoking McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
