Search for: "In re Means"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 89,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 7:00 pm
As long as we're asking questions, here’s a musical one. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Our re-branding suggestion is attached. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:46 am
As to the meanings of the marks, there was nothing in the record to support a finding that LENS would be perceived as anything other than the common word "lens. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 3:38 am
They're NOT heads. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:10 am
Put it in writing and explain to your employees what the policy means. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
As a rejection based on prior artcannot be based on speculations and assumptions, see In re Steele, 305 F.2d859, 862 (CCPA 1962), we are constrained to reverse, pro forma, theExaminer's rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:56 am
That seems to me quite relevant even from a market-focused perspective, especially since people looking at news shortly after broadcast, when they’re scanning for topics, can’t be sure what moments will later be awkward for Fox to acknowledge.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm
” But does this mean that you should buy a pet franchise in 2024? [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:11 am
I say can, which does not mean will in all instances. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:10 am
I might have watched if I'd known that.Hey, WaPo, "well oiled" means drunk. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
It's actually pretty simple: not forcing folks to buy something doesn't mean they won't, anyway. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 4:33 am
"You're fired! [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 6:31 pm
It may be that there are none and, if that is the case, then the trial court should re-open the issue of compelling Owners, against their sincerely held religious beliefs, to connect to the Authority’s sewer system. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:41 am
What does this case mean for you? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:36 am
In re Scorpion Protective Coatings, Inc., Serial No. 86617791 (February 27, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Francie R. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:19 am
Or does it mean it’s time to try again? [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 8:37 am
You're just going to lean into that? [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:20 am
At this point in the case, I cannot tell who, if anyone, is playing fast and loose with the meaning of [a claim term]. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:22 am
"Thus, the shared meaning of PLUM and BLACKPLUM engenders a very similar commercial impression. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:09 am
In re Royal Wine Corporation, Serial No. 85775626 (October 16, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]