Search for: "In re Means" Results 7341 - 7360 of 89,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2008, 7:00 pm by Unknown
As long as we're asking questions, here’s a musical one. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:46 am
As to the meanings of the marks, there was nothing in the record to support a finding that LENS would be perceived as anything other than the common word "lens. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:10 am by Jon Hyman
Put it in writing and explain to your employees what the policy means. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As a rejection based on prior artcannot be based on speculations and assumptions, see In re Steele, 305 F.2d859, 862 (CCPA 1962), we are constrained to reverse, pro forma, theExaminer's rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  That seems to me quite relevant even from a market-focused perspective, especially since people looking at news shortly after broadcast, when they’re scanning for topics, can’t be sure what moments will later be awkward for Fox to acknowledge.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
It's actually pretty simple: not forcing folks to buy something doesn't mean they won't, anyway. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 6:31 pm by Howard Friedman
It may be that there are none and, if that is the case, then the trial court should re-open the issue of compelling Owners, against their sincerely held religious beliefs, to connect to the Authority’s sewer system. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:36 am
In re Scorpion Protective Coatings, Inc., Serial No. 86617791 (February 27, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Francie R. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:20 am by Docket Navigator
At this point in the case, I cannot tell who, if anyone, is playing fast and loose with the meaning of [a claim term]. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:22 am
"Thus, the shared meaning of PLUM and BLACKPLUM engenders a very similar commercial impression. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:09 am
In re Royal Wine Corporation, Serial No. 85775626 (October 16, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]