Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 10,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 11:09 am
In that 2005 case, Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
As the Supreme Court said in Eldred v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:47 am
In Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
” Elsewhere in the news the Chicago Tribune’s David Savage and James Vicini of Reuters James Vicini both discuss Astrue v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm
Instead, it goes out of its way to pit Silicon Valley v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
James: "The Law Firm commenced the instant action to recover legal fees in the amount of $58,900.36, arising from its representation of Simon during her underlying matrimonial action, entitled Simon v Simon (Sup Ct, NY County, Index No.: 303306/2001). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:07 pm
In Dishmon et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
This week, in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:22 am
The problem with the AWR is that it doesn’t resolve the issue, highlighted in cases like Dacas v Brook Street and James v Greenwich Borough Council, of whom the worker should sue in the event that they feel they have been unfairly dismissed. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:01 pm
James In the case of Collins v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm
[xxii] State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
James DeMint of South Carolina is ridiculed as “Sen. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:14 am
Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General; James M. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
