Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT" Results 7341 - 7360 of 36,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided on April 22, 2010, in the United States District Court, Southern District Texas, Houston Division, by District Judge Gray H. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 6:40 pm by Mary Whisner
Higginbotham,The Present Plight of the United States District Courts ... 745Emery G. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6262 Issue: Whether, under the Supreme Court’s opinions in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
In re Metoprolol Succinate Patent Litigation, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 06-1254. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:46 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
In predicting how the high court would decide, some state appellate and federal district courts have adopted the strict minimum two-year employment rule that Jared K. and other defendants invoke. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:44 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of TennesseeOpinion Date: 8/4/10Cite: J.T. [read post]
20 May 2014, 1:15 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 The war on citizens, also known as the war on drugs continues in United States District Courts across the country. [read post]
20 May 2014, 1:15 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 The war on citizens, also known as the war on drugs continues in United States District Courts across the country. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  The federal court system has established a task force to provide information and guidance to district and circuit courts. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 4:15 am by Logan Murr
On February 4, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded a patent infringement decision of the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
Josh is also right to suggest that yesterday’s decision is much more carefully argued than an earlier poorly reasoned December federal district court decision in Pennsylvania, which concluded that the entire policy is unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v Seljan, October 23, 2008, upheld federal officials seizure of the defendant's letters during a routine search. [read post]