Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 7341 - 7360
of 24,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2010, 1:42 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Harrison v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:39 am
On the day of the plaintiff's criminal trial, Socha failed to come to court, and the State entered a nolle prosequi.McCarthy v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Moderator: Kelly Maser, United States Olympic Committee (United States) Ambush marketing: capitalizing on the excitement surrounding an event. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:36 pm
This emotionally charged case was fully litigated in the South Carolina courts and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:21 am
In US v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:00 pm
Six days later, Contec sued CTDI for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (“the New York action”). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:51 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:31 am
Windmill Durango Office, LLC, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
In APPLE INC. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
The Fort Worth Division of the United States District Court, Northern Division, recently handed down a decision that would at the least be interesting to home builders. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 8:12 am
Hejran is staff counsel at Americans United for Life, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 207 members of Congress in support of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm
Cottrell v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:00 pm
In Milo & Gabby, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:10 am
Third, more policy focus should be placed on integration—a goal that has largely been abandoned since the last concerted efforts to enforce Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
Relying heavily on Skilling v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:39 am
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
