Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 7361 - 7380 of 13,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 1:28 pm by Peter Tannenwald
If a Class A station does not complete digital construction by May 29, it will still be subject to the September 1 deadline for all Class A stations to complete digital construction. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:47 am by David Oxenford
The FCC also notes that, even if a Class A station does not meet the May 29 deadline, and is not protected in the auction, it still must be operating digitally by September 1 – the extension announced today is only for LPTV stations. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The German legislator made use of this right and implemented section 52 b UrhG with effect of 1 January 2008. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
In this regard, the ARB noted: “The ALJ ruled that the Hague Convention does not require foregoing the federal rules or ALJ discovery rules when those rules serve the purpose effectively. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
While the MPPAA does restrict to some degree judicial review of an arbitrator’s factual findings, it provides de novo judicial review of the arbitrator’s legal conclusions. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Eligible assets are those that would currently be included in Class 29 (with a CCA rate of 50 percent on a straight-line basis). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
The prevalence of Listeria in ready-to-eat meats has not proven difficult to explain. [26, 29] As one expert in another much-cited article has noted: The centralized production of prepared ready-to-eat food products…increases the risk of higher levels of contamination, since it requires that foods be stored for long periods at refrigerated temperatures that favour the growth of Listeria. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While Mother shall be the custodial parent with sole and final decision-making, this does not end the analysis. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
DAVID KELLY, Appellee. 2nd District.Creditors' rights -- Garnishment -- Service of process on garnishee LLC was defective where writ of garnishment was served on an hourly employee who is not an officer or manager, who does not supervise other personnel, who does not have any direct client contact, and who is not the registered agent for service of process -- There is no merit to contention that employee was a business agent authorized to accept service of process -- Trial… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am by Jeff Welty
But, as noted by the dissent, it does not align very well with the majority’s reasoning that a stop should stay focused on its “mission” rather than general crime detection. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:39 am
The InfoSoc Directive Art 3(1) merely restates WCT Art 8, virtually verbatim. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
”[16]  Hence, the Supreme Court drew a distinction between (1) a post-sale restriction, which attempts to impose restrictions on the patented [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
One possible explanation is that the FTC Act, unlike the federal antitrust statutes enforced by the FTC, does not confer a private right of action. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
., --- Cal.App.4th --- (1/29/2015), the plaintiff, Augustus, worked as a security guard for the defendant, ABM. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
  He began his analysis by explaining that thevoid-for-vagueness doctrine, rooted in the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment, `requires that a penal statute define the criminal offense [1] with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and [2] in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. [read post]