Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 7,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
The case, Snyder v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:41 pm
Housing law, law [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 12:15 am
In my FindLaw column today, I describe the Supreme Court's treatment of the petitioner in Bowles v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:09 am
., Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No 04 C 5312, 2007 WL 1628352 (N.D. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
A close observer of the court system has said three law firms are preparing a possible suit against the governor and the Legislature. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Almost immediately after the May 29 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Defendants were granted an extension to file their Answer on or before today, June 8th, and a preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 16, 2007.I hope to follow this case closely. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matos v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
Testimony further established that during this period, the defendant was at the house frequently. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:01 pm
It follows that variable annuities should not be sold to individuals who are retired or close to retirement. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
I can hardly disagree too much with a theory that closely tracks the questions I tend to ask about constitutional change and the methods I have advocated. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 7:53 am
. * * * Cedillo v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
But he was damn close to it.Execution has become a medical procedure in the US. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:52 am
Von Hor v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:13 pm
In Jane Doe v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:45 am
He and his brother own a house together. [read post]
28 May 2007, 10:47 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:05 pm
While the Fourth Amendment claim of the officers' entry into plaintiff's house was a close call, the court instead moved to the qualified immunity question which it found not close at all. [read post]
