Search for: "House v. State" Results 7361 - 7380 of 25,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2010, 12:25 am by Abhinav Chandrachud
A recent United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:09 pm
In 2002 the United States Supreme Court decided Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v NLRB. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
Wolf gives any evidence of having read, even while stating my opinions for me), and I did not conflate them in my interview with Ms. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Yet, the lack of state revenue led the Legislature to force counties to house a growing number of convicted inmates in county jails, a function for which they were largely unequipped and underfunded. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
There can be no doubt that media freedom in South Africa suffered some major blows in 2011, not least by the lower house of Parliament, the National Assembly, passing the Protection of State Information Bill, known in some quarters as the Secrecy Bill. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm by Ken
Here it was, Saturday night, and I was all set for a relaxing evening: a few beers at the Yard House and then a movie with my lovely wife, perhaps a few (or a few dozen) turns of Civ V (with the expansion), and sleep. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Bouaphakeo (and more); Steven Calabresi on originalism and liberty; Steven Eagle on wetlands law; Harvey Silverglate and Emma Quinn-Judge on McDonnell and honest-services-fraud prosecutions of state and local officials; and Glenn Reynolds looking ahead to this (2016-17) term; Federal agency can’t unilaterally rewrite unambiguous statutory provision [Ilya Shapiro and Frank Garrison on Cato certiorari amicus in FLSA tip-pooling case of National Restaurant Association v. [read post]