Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 8,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
Jonathan Markell’s 18 months behind bars is perhaps the most given in a transnational antiquities trafficking case since U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
In Bronston v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:08 am
In the context of trespass, for example, emergency can entitle yachters stranded on a stormy lake to tie up at a stranger’s dock without permission, on the theory that avoiding the loss of their lives is more important than respecting the owner’s negative liberty (remember Ploof v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:11 am
See e.g., Chaset v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:57 am
The importance of the difference in purpose was set out in bold relief just yesterday in Justice Sotomayor's opinion for the Court in Michigan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:15 pm
Even the courts are taking an interest: Bell Canada v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:38 am
“ As regards the 3(c) issue, this provision has been largely left undisturbed since the rulings of the court in Sanofi v Actavis[2] and Boehringer Ingelheim v Actavis[3] which held that even if Article 3(a) was satisfied, in circumstances where a basic patent included a claim to a product comprising an active ingredient which constituted the sole subject matter of the invention and for which the holder of that patent had already obtained an SPC as well as a subsequent claim… [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:53 am
Tellingly, it is full of interpretive, albeit subtle pro-amendment arguments – but without laying out counterarguments. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:10 am
The decision came in the case of Medellin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm
Thresholds and Scope The document lays out several concepts that will impact which companies are affected and how much they will need to pay. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
Alternatively, I could have discussed the ‘libel trial of the year’ between Johnny Depp and News Group Newspapers (John Christopher Depp II v News Group Newspapers Limited and Dan Wootton). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
There could be no action under the Equalities Act 2010 since, although ‘belief’ is a protected characteristic, discrimination against an objectionable political belief does not count (see Grainger Plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360, [28]). [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 5:57 am
This ruling, from Georgia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:58 pm
., Nefedro v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm
This problem was documented in a March 18, 2021 decision, Saunders v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This practice has been updated in line with High Court Decision Just Employment (a firm) v Just Employment Law Ltd [2007] EWHC 2203 (Ch) When meaning "pure", for example, JUST JUICE, object under Section 3(1)(b) and (c). [read post]
