Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
Case(s) in which the Solicitor General has recently filed a brief for the United States, as directed by the Court: Docket: 08-1191 Title: Morrison v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
 Lyle and ACSblog also have posts about the merits briefs filed yesterday in two cases â€" Holder v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Holder, 626 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
Monday, Nov. 16: Holder v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:40 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:36 am
The case, Lakewood Chiropractic Clinic v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:10 am
Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:27 am
Holder. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:09 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled in Kerr v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:18 am
On November 10, 2009, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a case that arose from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Kucana v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:57 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has just ruled in Kerr v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:59 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS Â [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:46 am
The question asked in this reference actually relates to the Regulation 3295/94, the predecessor of Regulation 1383/2003: Is Article 6.2(b) of Council Regulation 3295/94 of 22 December 1994 (the old Customs Regulation) a rule of standardised Community law that must be observed by the Court of the Member State that has been applied to by the holder of that right in accordance with Article 7 of the Regulation, and does that rule mean that the court, in making its assessment, may not… [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:57 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments yesterday (Nov. 10, 2009) on the issue of whether 8 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:28 pm
Supreme Court on Monday considered the issue of what types of technology should be eligible for patent protection when it heard oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:23 am
Holder, the Court will consider the question. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:23 am
" Henderson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Intellectual Property Holders of Pictoral Copyrights Denied Intervention In Google Infringement Action Pending Settlement The Authors Guild v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:50 am
In eBay v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
’); U.S. v. [read post]
