Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 19,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 1:05 am
(b) Is a court of a Member State permitted to apply a national provision (here the second sentence of Paragraph 26(3) of the Law on trade marks (MarkenG)) which conflicts with a provision of a directive (here Article 10(1) and (2)(a) of Directive 89/104/EEC) in cases in which the facts of the case had already occurred prior to a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in which indications of the incompatibility of the Member State's legislation with the… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm
Richardson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 9:22 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” United States v. [read post]
Craigslist Wins $1.3M Default Judgment Against Autoposting Facilitator -- craigslist v. Naturemarket
25 Mar 2010, 10:25 am
This is exactly what state regulators did to craigslist. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:03 am
In Muscarello v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 9:50 am
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
The first is Gundy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports that the justices “weighed whether to uphold a lower-court decision that could mean that nearly half the state of Oklahoma is still an American Indian reservation, with implications for taxation, education, and criminal justice. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:20 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am
The logo’s protection as a US and an EU trade mark also doesn’t hurt. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
” (internal quotation marks, brackets, andcitations omitted)); Mars Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:24 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
” Briefly: At ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt marked the forty-seventh anniversary of the Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
Points to note As stated above, this is a significant judgement, so there is a lot to take on board. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
He expressed doubt about the government's argument that trying the case would jeopardize state secrets, but said he would wait to decide the case until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rules on Hepting v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:43 pm
"The overriding consideration in this case," the judge ruled, "is that some of the very same issues Plaintiff presents here are currently pending for decision before the Supreme Court of the United States," citing the case of Baze v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:09 pm
Posted by David V. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:22 am
Escobar from a state and local government perspective. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:58 pm
Brumbelow further stated that this is a duty that should fall on the shoulders of vehicle manufacturers, not consumers. [read post]
