Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit"
Results 7361 - 7380
of 7,495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirms the rejection of his various constitutional claims summarized in the title of this post. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:45 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
The Court asked for the views of the United States in November 2006. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
Appeal is only a review on the record produced in the lower court for errors of law. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:40 pm
Reference to title 35, United States Code.Sec. 3. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 2:04 pm
In a April 26, 2007, Order, the Third Circuit vacated its February 28, 2007, precedential opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:46 am
Wecht (decided April 12, 2007), the Third Circuit addressed three applications arising during the prosecution of the Allegheny County coroner (Wecht). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
He was sentenced to 37 months' incarceration under the regime announced in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
Robinson, Appeal No. 05-5330 (3d Cir. 3/5/07, published 4/16/07), the Third Circuit fell in line with every other Circuit to consider the issue when it ruled that the United States Supreme Court's recent confrontation clause decision in Crawford v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
" United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:29 am
Reference to Title 35, United States Code. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:14 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holds that federal district courts may only prohibit attorney speech that is substantially likely to materially prejudice ongoing criminal proceedings: A three-judge Third Circuit panel has today issued its much anticipated decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 8:27 am
In fact, in his motion, Padilla relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 8:48 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
