Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 721 - 740
of 56,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
This year the Supreme Court Historical Society’s Frank C. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:02 pm
As noted over at the Antitrust Hotch Potch, the Court of Justice has handed down its judgment in Case C-95/04 P British Airways Plc v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 3:41 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an important judgment in Case C-112/05 Commission v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 7:09 am
§ 3582(c)(2). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
City of Santa Monica v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:13 am
As observed in Jack v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 3:32 am
Descarga el documento: Pueblo v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 5:10 pm
Michael C. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:25 pm
Cree que el Código tiene cosas nuevas que en verdad son mas viejas que el agua tibia (algunas ya las tenía el propio Código de Vélez). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
The Story of Bivens v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:51 am
Pueblo v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 7:42 pm
Matthew C. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
& C. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:33 am
Employee's status critical element in determining General Municipal Law Section 207-a and 207-c benefitsBarnes v PERB, NYS Supreme Court, [Not officially reported]Upon separation or retirement, the value of accrued vacation and other leave credits to be paid to an individual depends on his employment status. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:01 am
Visita nuestro Observatorio COVID-19 en Puerto Rico El profesor Pedro Juan Cabán Vales de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico (UIPR) explicó a Microjuris.com que Proyecto de la Cámara 1654, mejor conocido como el proyecto del nuevo Código Civil, debería sufrir enmiendas adicionales antes de alcanzar la firma de la gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
Negotiating administrative procedures to administer General Municipal Law Sections 207-a and 207-cRiverhead v Foote, State Sup. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 7:44 am
James C. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 11:22 am
Andrew C. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:20 pm
Eleventh Circuit grants rehearing en banc to consider whether “the risk of force clause in 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Sessions v. [read post]
