Search for: "David S. Kennedy"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
At Take Care, David Gans suggests that, based on the tenor of the argument, “it seems that the Justices inclined to uphold partisan gerrymandering will face an uphill battle to convince Justice Kennedy that Wisconsin’s extreme partisan gerrymander can be squared with the First Amendment principles Kennedy holds dear. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:38 am
Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court debates politics, and Kennedy's silence speaks volumes. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:57 am
Finkel, David S. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:57 am
Finkel, David S. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
The workshops also featured Benedict Dellaert of the Netherlands’ Erasmus University Rotterdam, Sorelle Friedler of Haverford College, Stephen Goldsmith of the Harvard Kennedy School, John Mikhail and David Robinson of Georgetown Law, Helen Nissenbaum of Cornell University, and Andrew Selbst of the Yale Information Society Project. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:22 am
Justice Kennedy’s record in past gerrymandering cases is mixed, but he has previously recognized that the First Amendment may be a specific limit on partisan gerrymandering by the states. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
The news channel KCRA3 posted video of Kennedy’s speech online. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:25 pm
Kennedy | Published: 9/26/2017 In an era in which states are barring politicians from lobbying their former colleagues until after a waiting period, an investigation found three current elected officials in Illinois working as lobbyists. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
Here’s the suggested language: WARNING: This raw (unpasteurized) milk (cream) may contain disease-causing organisms. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
” At Reuters, David Beasley reports that “Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch opposed the stay. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Four other justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer – disagreed; they would have allowed courts to review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
” As Justice Kennedy explained, “the petitioners in these cases seek to find that liberty by marrying someone of the same sex and having their marriages deemed lawful on the same terms and conditions as marriages between persons of the opposite sex” (emphasis added). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage highlights “the major questions before the court this fall. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:14 am
Mahoney (Yale 2006 / Kozinski), partner at Williams & Connolly Justice David H. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:20 am
14 Sep 2017, 4:20 am
It’s bad enough that Justice Kennedy made the mistake in the first place. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:28 am
” On that principle, there ought to be no question that Colorado’s law allowing Charlie Craig and David Mullins to buy a wedding cake from any bakery they choose – notwithstanding that they are gay – should trump claims by a bakery that providing the cake would violate the owner’s religious beliefs. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:47 am
Massachusetts, in which the court held that defendants have a constitutional right to cross-examine the chemists who tested drug samples used as evidence in the defendants’ trials, concluding that “time has borne out some of both Scalia’s and Kennedy’s predictions and revealed that others were unfounded. [read post]