Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 721 - 740 of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2009, 5:58 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a very well worded opinion that court held: [Not] everything a lawyer writes during the course of litigation must be stated in plain English understandable by unsophisticated consumers. [read post]
11 May 2009, 5:58 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a very well worded opinion that court held: [Not] everything a lawyer writes during the course of litigation must be stated in plain English understandable by unsophisticated consumers. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Former Governor Schwarznegger's State Labor Commissioner Angela Bradstreet had raised some eyebrows among the plaintiffs' bar by backing the employer side in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
Anyone can challenge a patent in court proceedings, so the act of state doctrine was not an impediment, even if validity were in issue. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 2:00 am by Emma Irwin (Bristows)
Wyeth referred Meade J. to the Idenix v Gilead and KCI v Smith & Nephew cases when making its submissions on the principles of the law on CGK. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:05 am by Martin George
The Assessment of Damages Under English law the assessment of damages in tort claims falls to be decided as a procedural issue (Harding v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:55 am
Earlier this month Judge Birss QC handed down his judgement in the Patents County Court case of Temple Island Collections Limited v New English Teas Limited and Nicholas Houghton. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am by Chukwuma Okoli
  This rule as applied in Nigeria  –  often referred to as the  Mocambique  rule  –  is derived from the English case of British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique [1893] AC 602. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by EEM
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its opinion in the case of IRAP v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 1:30 am by Paul Cassell
Third, given this history, why did the Court hold in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm by Luke Gilman
It’s cited in Douglas Baird’s chapter in Intellectual Property Stories on International News Service v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
But can the providers of blog platforms, whose business model is to make the process as easy as possible, be held liable for their contents in English law? [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
But even if we accept that we should teach from cases, when it comes to common-law subjects, why should we limit ourselves to the opinions of state and federal courts with the occasional ancient English case thrown in? [read post]