Search for: "Givens v. Street"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
The main judgment by Stanley Burnton LJ was given in robust terms and without regret (at [61]). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
” These on-the-street requests may give rise to legal questions in court. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
Similarly, asome fabric designs can be given copyright protection as works of art and as prints (see Peter Pan Fabrics v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Golinsky v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 12:26 am
Shawn Minihan won in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:06 am
” Yoo will talk about the Verizon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:30 pm
Moreover she had not been given the opportunity to consider Dr Anantha’s second report of 2nd May; (3) that the reviewing officer had not properly considered how street homelessness would impact on the appellant’s psychiatric condition. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 4:33 am
” Wei Cheng Chang v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm
Allen Myers LP v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 6:03 am
This is Part II of my discussion of Dancy v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:55 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:19 am
On the street. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:44 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 10:58 am
Court of Appeals in Doe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:09 am
One of the issues raised in the Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
Counsel pointed out that after the Fifth District’s decision in Rogers had come down, the First District, Division Five had decided the same question the opposite way in Guzman v. 7513 West Madison Street, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
The plaintiff had been given a designated accessible parking space on the street in front of her home many years in the past in keeping with the city’s obligation under Title II of the ADA to provide accessible street parking. [read post]
