Search for: "Johnson v. People"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2019, 1:59 pm
In the recent CBC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
How are these people going to pay an additional tax? [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 12:15 pm
Hank Johnson (D-GA) and U.S Sen. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Davis v Johnson (1978) Susan Edwards49. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Johnson, are the first to apply Grady v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:57 am
In 1883, in Pace v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
The notice is a way for the parties to fight.Greenberg: relatively few counternotices are filed; abusive counternotices exist too. 512(f) case of Johnson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am
Where I’m located, there are a lot of people who work for Johnson & Johnson, and Johnson & Johnson is basically known for equaling. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
In 1986, in a case called Batson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
“It’s a very small town where everybody knows everybody, apparently, or many people know many people,” Justice Elena Kagan says to Johnson. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm
The final result in Colistro v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 1:25 pm
, People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
People move to the cities and fertile farm land where wealth is to be had, so the more people a state had, the wealthier the state would be. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am
” See People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 7:15 am
Rivello Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Employers may, for example, treat one group more favorably than another pursuant to a bona fide affirmative action plan in order to remedy past discrimination (Johnson v. [read post]