Search for: "Lopez v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2011, 7:31 pm
The unanimous opinion in Bond v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:06 am
Indeed, defendant's plea allocution suggested that his underlying schizoaffective disorder, for which he was unmedicated, caused him to be in a "psychotic state" at the time of the crime. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:14 pm
Oregon V. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:04 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
As the Court stated in the 1995 case of US v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 6:59 am
Lopez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
At the same time that the individual mandate was being enacted in Congress, the Supreme Court heard a very signifiicant case on the Necessary and Proper Clause, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dequincy Lopez v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
Lopez–Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 588 (9th Cir.1992)). [read post]
12 May 2008, 6:06 pm
Co. v Bettenhauser, 95 NY2d 185, 188; State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
(This situation is not confined to the Federal system, either; two years ago in State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 3:25 am
JUST CLICK ON THE CASE NAMES BELOW… Federal Circuit Court Opinion of Related Interest United States of America v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:23 pm
Calise v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:59 pm
The Supreme Court relied on its 1995 decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:59 pm
Yesterday, the Seventh Circuit joined with the Fifth in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Lopez (invalidating the Gun Free School Zones Act as beyond the scope of Congressional power) and Gonzales v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm
Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are pretty obvious votes for the mandate, as they dissented in United States v. [read post]
