Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 721 - 740 of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2007, 5:36 am
What he actually wants to do is reverse the effect of the Lords' judgment in YL v Birmingham earlier this year, which ruled that private care homes do not have to act compatibly with the [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 9:57 am
Advocate General Kokott’s Opinion in Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta SpA) and Others v West Tankers Inc. is out, and the House of Lords (and most common law practitioners) are not going to find it a pleasurable read. [read post]
13 May 2021, 10:15 pm by Simon Gibbs
As far back as 2005, Lord Justice Brooke observed in Black v Pastouna & Anor [2005] EWCA Civ 1389 that: “It is incumbent on those advising parties appearing before this, or any, court to take all the steps they can in accordance with CPR Rules 1.1 and 1.3 to reduce the cost of the proceedings. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 4:02 pm
The government recently lost a claim in the House of Lords in Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v HMC of Inland Revenue, the proposed legislation will reverse the judgment.  This is law making with a vengeance and will be fun to watch, we predict that banks and companies will not take this lying down. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:43 am by sally
This scheme provides detailed rules for costs management, including the provision and approval of costs budgets, and is indicative of the approach propounded by Lord Justice Jackson in his Final Report on Civil Litigation Costs. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On 17 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales and Burrows) granted the defendant in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg LP permission to appeal the order of the Court of Appeal dated 15 May 2020 ([2020] 3 WLR 838). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 5:46 am by INFORRM
On 21 March 2018 the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr and Reed and Lady Black) granted the defendants permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 5:35 am
The average time between a parent claiming child support and receiving any payment is now 17 years and 11 months.October - The House of Lords gives it's judgment in the landmark case of Black v Black. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
Principles of stare decisis are typically throwaway values. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer:  Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC;  Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders:  Clark QC, J Brown;  Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:53 pm
Craig Keenan from Community Law Partnership has added another comment to my original post on Omar -v- Birmingham CC to the effect that funding may be forthcoming for a House of Lords appeal. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Collins agreed with Lord Walker and Lady Hale, and added some reflections of his own. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:54 am
Fisher v Brooker [2009] UKHL 41 In October, their Lordships (?) [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:37 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court (Lords Wilson, Briggs and Kitchin) has today granted Google LLC permission to appeal against the order of the Court of Appeal in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599) granting the representative claimant permission serve a representative claim out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am by INFORRM
But the substance of Lord Lester’s objection depends on the judgment of Mr Justice Eady in the case of Mosley v News Group Newspapers ([2008] EWHC 1777 (QB)). [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:30 am by familoo
” 18 One of the merits of great advocates, as Lord Pearce pointed out in Rondel v Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191 at p 255G, has been the ability ruthlessly to sacrifice nine points and win on the tenth and best. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:22 am by INFORRM
The three appeals – in two libel privacy cases and one dealing with phone hacking – will give the Supreme Court an opportunity to reconsider the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN Ltd (No.2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3394) in the light of the decision of the Court of Human Rights in MGN v United Kingdom ([2011] ECHR 66). [read post]