Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 721 - 740
of 14,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2017, 9:25 am
“There’s a lot of things people don’t say on television – not because people don’t want to hear it, but because sponsors don’t want to hear it. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:01 pm
No matter how awesome the person they’d be leaving for, in-house lawyers don’t leave their jobs. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:43 am
But when a case involves mountains of digital evidence, finding that story isn’t always easy or economical. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:42 am
If stirrup is so weak or descriptive, why didn't Applicant have to disclaim it? [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:27 pm
In both the GC found they did matter. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Summary judgment is appropriate where a plaintiff fails to establish that a prescribing physician’s decision to prescribe a particular medication would have changed had a different warning been givenId. at *16 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:18 am
The subject-matter of the claim had no basis in document B29. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:20 am
Opposer Rolex alleged likelihood of confusion with its purported common law mark IT DOESN’T JUST TELL TIME. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:57 pm
Last week of the regular season and we just can't seem to stay above the 1000 mark. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am
” SPI didn’t have a word mark in ELIT, but rather it had registrations for stylized versions of ELIT, a word mark in STOLICHNAYA ELIT, and variations on the stylized versions plus other stuff. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
But I guess that won’t matter much going forward.] [read post]
Labels Matter: How Professor Jack Balkin Snookered Justice Kagan and Others to Fuel Faux Originalism
15 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
In this sense, as Mark Tushnet likes to say, "law is politics all the way down," at least in the constitutional sphere, where so many of us reside. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
The reality, as the court noted elsewhere in its discussion, is that scope and protectability are entwined in this case: the key issue is whether Vintage can put the matter across the front of T-shirts, etc., not whether Penn State could get a valid registration for its marks used as marks.) [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:59 am
Be he insisted that he didn’t consider what he did to be plagiarism. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:22 am
They were filed a day before the hearing in this matter. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
I have defended marks with very little, but defeated marks with more. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
(If you don’t believe a federal officer may be impeached based on his or her conduct prior to taking office, please review the impeachments of Judge Robert W. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
We have a lot to catch up on, don't we? [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:55 pm
” In addition, Dastarwarns that “[t]he words of the Lanham Act should not be stretched to cover matters that are typically of no consequence to purchasers. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Here there was no evidence to suggest that the public would see the name as indicating the geographical origin of anything covered by SBM's marks, and the matter was not so clear as to justify inferring that such an association should be made. [read post]
