Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
p. 2 keep it “totally secret[,] because one day we [may] need to escape the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:09 am by Tom Smith
A state-funded charter school in North Carolina may not require female students to wear skirts because it counts as a state actor, the en banc U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:04 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Fla.Case No. 1:07-CIV-21403-JIC, Filed May 31, 2007, Settled August 26, 2008Much like Blizzard v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 11:03 am by Reproductive Rights
By Richard Storrow (May 4, 2022) In a widely anticipated move, the United States Supreme Court has voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:45 am by Walter Olson
On Jan. 11, the Supreme Court hears what may well be the most important case of the term. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by NATASHA NGUYEN
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:58 am by Paul Venard
In order to receive government funding, the state is requiring that such couples be considered. [read post]