Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 132,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:15 am
Maureen May contracted Coccidioidomycosis (commonly known as “Cocci” or “Valley Fever”)—a disease caused by the inhalation of Coccidioides spores, a fungus germane to the semi-arid areas of the southwestern states. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
In Okemgbo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am
Mann The post Ex-Employee’s Continued Use of Twitter Account May Be Conversion–Farm Journal v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals has just made clear in Alphonso Owens v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:09 am
A state-funded charter school in North Carolina may not require female students to wear skirts because it counts as a state actor, the en banc U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:35 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
In Young v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
p. 2 keep it “totally secret[,] because one day we [may] need to escape the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:05 am
In Ark Encounter, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:00 am
This week at SCOTUS: United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm
Since its Apprendi v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
