Search for: "Morrison v. Work"
Results 721 - 740
of 741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
Jackson’s wise words to his fellow Americans in 1945: It is futile to think, as extreme nationalists do, that we can have an international law that is always working on our side. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
I am testifying next week before the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)I have just posted a preliminary draft of an article that is currently entitled The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View from International Law and Standards. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Box 22501 Eugene, OR 97402 Phone: (541) 689-7242 (V/TTY) Fax: (541) 461-8601 E-mail: kswezey@efn.org Web: http://www.shhhor.org Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Deaf and Hard of Hearing Access Program Orego [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
It is, instead, based simply on the following postulates: -- the conclusion, accepted by all, that Congress could require one to purchase insurance to pay for health care "at the point of sale"; -- the fact that the government guarantees that one can receive the most expensive health-care services even if one does not have the resources to pay for them (or for insurance) at the point of sale; -- the idea that if Congress can impose such a requirement at the point of sale, it can also… [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am
On July 11, 2014, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v Loudermilk (here) that the common law of Georgia recognizes the business judgment rule and that the rule has not been superseded by Georgia statutory law. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
Although the aircraft carriers worked separately, Chinese state-owned news outlet the Global Times reported that the aircraft carriers will soon form a dual carrier group. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
Although the aircraft carriers worked separately, Chinese state-owned news outlet the Global Times reported that the aircraft carriers will soon form a dual carrier group. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Pix Credit here Everyone takes their orthodoxy in different ways. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
In the Watergate example, Congress did not simply wait for the press and a special prosecutor to do all the work. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
EPA in 2002 for violating the federal Clean Water Act, has been working under the time table of a June 2003 consent decree, which required it to hire qualified top management, create plans, accurately map the systems and make specific improvements. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
It's compelling evidence in support of a previous allegation that John Steele was using Prenda to run a "honeypot": that is, rather than protecting copyrighted works, he was deliberately posting them in places where they were likely to be downloaded, and then suing the downloaders as a revenue-generating scheme. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
We agree with most of the Morrison comments (which are technical) and reserve judgment on the Weiss comment.We recommend a "yes" vote on all three amendments, and here's why.Proposed Amendment Number 1: Single issue class actions aren't that frequent and should stay that way. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
