Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2012, 8:13 am
DELOGE v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:13 am
DELOGE v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 5:25 am
*In Phillip Morris v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in opposition for respondent Jeppesen… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
It is undisputed that Honeywell performed this work in the United States prior to Solvay's priority date of October 23, 1995. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:02 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
United States, the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Three justices (you need four for an outright majority) agreed in a concurring opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
United States(1955). [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
Up first is Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom, who argued for cake artist Jack Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
In Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
For Lord Phillips, and the other five judges in the majority, the Mirror Principle won out [62, per Lord Phillips]: “It would not be satisfactory for the Coroner to conduct an inquest that did not satisfy the requirements of Article 2, leaving open the possibility of the appellants making a claim against the United Kingdom before the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
