Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
United States(1955). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
Up first is Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom, who argued for cake artist Jack Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
In Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
For Lord Phillips, and the other five judges in the majority, the Mirror Principle won out [62, per Lord Phillips]: “It would not be satisfactory for the Coroner to conduct an inquest that did not satisfy the requirements of Article 2, leaving open the possibility of the appellants making a claim against the United Kingdom before the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
., United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011): The European Court of Human Rights has rejected Abu Hamza’s claim that his trial in the United Kingdom for soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges was unfair. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 8:35 am
” Phillips v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:09 pm
The ruling, Bostock v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am
Since the Constitution was adopted, the United States has always had two levels of government — a national government that handles things which affect the states collectively, and state governments that look after matters within their borders. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:53 am
Together we represent thousands of organizations that employ millions of workers in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:09 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
Indeed, it is a bit difficult to explain why, exactly, password guessing leads to unauthorized access — the Fifth Circuit was forced to explain that seemingly obvious conclusion in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am
In August 2016, she placed the photograph—which has a pending copyright registration in the United States—on her Instagram page, accompanied by a copyright notice. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
The United States had one amicus brief this term with a composite score of over 90. [read post]
