Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2022, 8:44 am
Id. at *11; see id. at *10 (citing Phillips v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
November 24, 2021Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state In Matter of Phillip D.S. --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5364714, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
” Id. at *10.View #2: Modify CyborThe second approach, favored by some amici curiae including the United States, may be viewed as a fusion or hybrid of de novo review and deferential review. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
Is this, asks Merpel, the first time an appeal in any IP proceedings in the United Kingdom has been dealt with by a predominantly female tribunal? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
and the speakers are the all-too-infrequent IP Finance blogger Anne Fairpo (13 Old Square) and Kevin Phillips (no relation to this blogger) of Baker Tilly. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:48 am
As a result, the court relied heavily on an older California Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via FindLaw] United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:32 am
Likewise, the United States Constitution does not require counsel for indigent defendants seeking post-conviction relief. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm
State, 2009 WY 17, ¶ 3, 201 P.3d 434, 436 (Wyo. 2009); Harlow v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
United States. 36 Colum. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Julien v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:16 am
In Gray v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 5:47 pm
Clive Phillips The Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico issued an opinion in New Mexico v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Phillips of the Los Angeles office of Munger Tolles & Olson. [read post]
