Search for: "Scott v. Scott" Results 721 - 740 of 8,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2007, 9:30 am
Interesting article in today's Inside Higher Ed: A Ranking That Would Matter, by Scott Jaschik:As graduate students work their way through courses, dissertations and defenses, many have an ideal goal for the end: a job at a research university. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm by Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler
 Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler discuss this case on this episode of The Briefing. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 12:02 pm by Scott Hervey and Josh H. Escovedo
In this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog, Scott Hervey and Josh Escovedo discuss the Supreme Court’s first intellectual property ruling of 2022. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:30 am by Meg Martin
Arnold, Judge.Representing Appellant Nava: Scott Powers of Law Office of Scott Powers, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm by Scott Hervey and Jamie Lincenberg
Supreme Court provided clarification on the application of the Rogers test in relation to Jack Daniels v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 1:31 pm by Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler
 Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler discuss the court’s opinion on this episode of The Briefing. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 2:22 pm by Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler
There is some concern that the Supreme Court’s decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:25 am
Supreme Court's decision in this case, please use this link: Scott v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:47 pm
In an article titled, "Recent Court Decision Clarifies Whistleblower Law," Compliance Week reports about the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Van Asdale v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:10 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Scott Hervey
In this week’s episode, Josh Escovedo and Scott Hervey discuss an update to the litigation over Andy Warhol’s series of portraits of the artist Prince (Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith). [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:02 pm by David Jacobson
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003 Federal Court Judge Middleton decided the penalties arising from his decision in ASIC v Healey as follows: The CEO Scott has been ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a penalty in the amount of $30,000 plus a share of costs; the CFO Romano George Nenna is disqualified from managing corporations for a period of two years from 4.30pm on 10 October 2011; the applications for relief for… [read post]