Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 721 - 740 of 23,655
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2023, 6:33 am by Dan Bressler
” “The FTC in its lawsuit accused Amazon of abusing its power in the retail market as an ecommerce giant by unfairly giving preference to its own products and punishing merchants that want to sell products for lower prices on other platforms. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:14 pm by Kurt R. Karst
” The issue of whether this “second violation” felony requires evidence of intent was addressed in a recent Ninth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm by James J. Scherer
As KJK has previously covered, earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered a landmark ruling on the reach of the protections afforded by the Clean Water Act (CWA) in Sacket v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm by Nedim Malovic
While the CJEU’s case law (Ferrari SpA v DU (C-720/18) EU:C:2020:854 and Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C-40/01) EU:C: 2003:145) suggest that using the trade mark for spare parts might be considered genuine use for the complete product, the evidence submitted by Ferrari did not sufficiently demonstrate genuine use of the trade mark for relevant spare parts that could be seen as equivalent to an automobile.CommentThe Board’s decision clarifies the scope of… [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 am by Katherine White
Data brokers could no longer sell criminal records to individuals that want to vet their dates. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
Comment Whereas this decision appears to be consistent with the CJEU’s settled case-law pre-Louboutin v Amazon, distinguishing Louboutin primarily on the basis that Amazon operates a ‘hybrid’ model where it sells its own products as well as third parties’, it’s not necessarily clear what the policy rationale for drawing such a distinction in trade mark law might be. [read post]